Which Hardness Test is Best for Wear Plates: Brinell, Rockwell, or Vickers?

In abrasive environments where wear plates are deployed — such as mining chutes, steel mill hoppers, or cement plant liners — hardness isn’t just a number.

For a chromium carbide overlay wear plate or a bimetallic wear resistant plate, it’s a critical performance metric that predicts durability, ensures manufacturing quality, and reassures end-users.

But among the common hardness tests — Brinell (HB), Rockwell (HRC), and Vickers (HV) — which one is best suited for modern wear-resistant composite materials?

 

Why Hardness Testing Matters in Chromium Carbide Wear Plates

 

Wear resistance = Hardness:

In abrasive or high-impact applications, the surface hardness of a chromium carbide wear resistant plate directly influences its lifespan.

Manufacturing Quality Control: Routine hardness testing ensures that the overlay welding process produces consistent results.

Customer Confidence: Documented hardness values help engineers and procurement teams verify material performance upfront.

 

Structure of a Bimetallic Wear Plate: Why Testing Can Be Tricky

 

A bimetallic wear plate typically consists of:

Mild steel base (for weldability & structural support)

Hardfaced overlay layer (commonly chromium carbide)

This dual-layer structure complicates testing:

If the overlay is too thin, tests may inadvertently measure the base metal.

If the surface is uneven or has slag inclusions, results may vary.

 

Hardness Testing Methods: Pros & Cons

3.1 Brinell Hardness (HB)

How it works: Indents the surface using a steel/tungsten ball under heavy load.

Use case: Better for soft substrates like the base plate.

Limitation: Too coarse for thin overlays. Indentation may mix readings from both layers.

Verdict: ✅ Good for base metal / ❌ Poor for hard overlay

 

3.2 Rockwell Hardness (HRC)

How it works: A steel or diamond cone applies force; depth is measured electronically.

Use case: Common in workshop settings during production.

Limitation: Overlay thickness and microstructure inconsistencies can skew results.

Verdict: ✅ Moderate accuracy / ⚠ Requires careful calibration

 

3.3 Vickers Hardness (HV)

How it works: A diamond pyramid indenter presses onto the surface, and indentation is optically measured.

Use case: Excellent for thin coatings and precise lab measurement.

Limitation: Requires skilled setup, more time-intensive.

Verdict: ✅✅ Best choice for chromium carbide overlay wear plates

 

Summary: Which Test Should You Use?

 

Test Method

Best For

Accuracy on Overlay

Remarks

Brinell (HB) Base plate ❌ Low Indentation too deep
Rockwell (HRC) Production QC ✅ Moderate Common in industry
Vickers (HV) Precision R&D ✅✅ High Ideal for overlays

For evaluating chromium carbide wear plates or bimetallic liners, Vickers offers the most precise and overlay-specific results — especially when overlay thickness is under 6mm.

 

Factors That Impact Test Accuracy

 

To obtain consistent and reliable hardness readings on chromium carbide wear resistant plate materials, consider the following:

Overlay Thickness: Too thin = base metal influence

Surface Condition: Weld beads, slag, or grinding marks may affect readings

Dilution Zone: Mixed alloy zones between overlay and base can skew localized hardness


Post time: Aug-04-2025